Asustor focus on Intel processors only. They all made with metal case and looks solid. Let’s see how fast AS-602T could be with OSX.
Asustor AS-602T with ADM 2.4.0
AS-602T uses an Intel Atom D2700 which is a 2.13GHz dual-core processor with Intel Hyper-Threading Technology. It has 1MB L2 cache, Intel 64 Architecture, and supports up to 4GB DDR3.
The test machine comes with 1GB of DDR3 RAM and is upgradable to 3GB.
I install two Seagate Barracuda Desktop HDD as RAID 1 in it.
ADM 2.4.0 RFU6 for AS-602T is a 64-bit Linux used in this test. According to following information, I only know the build-in Samba is 4.0.19. Like QNAP TS-119PII, I cannot select smb version in [Services] → [Windows] → [File Service] Tab → [Advanced Options]. After contacting Asustor, I was informed current ADM supports smb 2.0. More related information about Samba and smb may be found in Samba Wiki: Samba3/SMB2.
admin@AS-602T:~ $ smbstatus Samba version 4.0.19 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- Failed to initialize session_global: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Service pid machine Connected at ------------------------------------------------------- Failed to initialize session_global: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Failed to traverse sessions: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED No locked files
Mac Mini Late 2012
I have upgrade my Mac mini to 16GB RAM and use a Seagate Laptop SSHD 1 TB which spins at 5400rpm and comes with 8GB MLC cache build-in to replace the slow hard drive.
Test Method
It is detail explained in Prepare Your NAS File Transfer Performance Test with Mac OSX Client. I test both Samba and NFS.
I also add test results from QNAP TS-253 Pro, TS-251, TS-119PII, Thecus N2520, and w5000 with OSX.
- QNAP TS-119PII with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- QNAP TS-251 with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- QNAP TS-253 Pro with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- Thecus N2520 with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- Thecus W5000 with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
Performance
Analyze
AS-602T is faster to TS-119PII, Thecus N2520, and w5000 on all tests. When compared to TS-251 with 1GB on Samba and NFS, AS-602T is about 10% slower on Samba reading but 10% faster on NFS. About writing, it is 25% slower with Samba while 15% with NFS.
If you use cifs:// in Finder to mount Samba shared drive on AS-602T, reading is 35% while writing is 23% slower compared to smb://.
More Thoughts
It seems ADM doesn’t have Samba compatibility issue with OSX. Just don’t use cifs:// in Finder which will slow down performance.
Reference
- Apple: Mac mini (Late 2012) – Technical Specifications
- Apple: OS X
- Apple: Support: Mac Basics: The Finder organizes all of your files
- Asustor
- Asustor ADM
- Asustor: AS-602T
- Intel
- Intel Atom Processor D2700
- Intel Hyper-Threading Technology
- Intel: Intel 64 Architecture
- Linux.org
- Prepare Your NAS File Transfer Performance Test with Mac OSX Client
- QNAP TS-119PII
- QNAP TS-119PII with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- QNAP TS-251
- QNAP TS-251 with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- QNAP TS-253 Pro
- QNAP TS-253 Pro with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- Samba
- Samba Wiki: Samba3/SMB2
- Seagate Barracuda Desktop Datasheet
- Seagate Laptop SSHD Datasheet
- Thecus N2520
- Thecus N2520 with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- Thecus W5000
- Thecus W5000 with Mac OSX File Transfer Performance Report
- Wiki: Multi-level cell
- Wiki: Network File System
- Wiki: Server Message Block
- Wiki: Standard RAID levels: 2 RAID 1