This post will be updated when I found more optimization in the future.
In QNAP TS-269L as a ZurmoCRM Application Server Performance Report, I was depressed with the result running ZurmoCRM on QTS platform which runs on QNAP device.
This time, I got a AS-602T from Asustor running ADM x64. They also provide me beta firmware with Alternative PHP Cache, Memcache, memcached, and PHP 5.5.3 R2 for testing. These should improve performance.
I am currently porting ZurmoCRM to QTS platform which runs on QNAP device. According to QNAP TS-269L as a LAMP Application Server Performance Report, I decide to focus on Intel Atom Processor based NAS first. If the performance is acceptable, I will support ARMADA XP later.
In previous test, SugarCRM running on an Intel Atom D2701 based QNAP TS-269L is as fast as Intel Atom D510 based Shuttle X50V2 running. How about the performance with ZurmoCRM? Is there any difference between QTS and Debian? Let’s take a look at it.
I am currently porting ZurmoCRM to QTS platform which runs on QNAP device. As mentioned in Performance Comparison on Retrieving Contacts from SugarCRM with QNAP TS-112, TS-212P, and TS-119PII, Marvell-based NAS didn’t perform well as an LAMP application server.
For LAMP developers, it is important to know the target environment. Because I am currently porting ZurmoCRM onto different NAS, I collect these environment and shared here. It should also ease me to port other LAMP applications in the future. I will maintain and update this list regularly.
One of my problems on Synology DSM is to find files. Therefore, I will maintain and update this list regularly.